don’t be too clingy
don’t be such a ‘girl’
be a woman
but be hairless like a childdon’t wear skimpy outfits
don’t be such a ‘slut’
be modest
but take it off when i ask
don’t assert yourself
don’t be such a ‘bitch’
be nice to me
but don’t be a fucking doormat
don’t be ignorant
don’t be such a ‘bimbo’
be intelligent
but don’t argue your opinion with me
don’t wear make-up ever
don’t be so ‘insecure’
be yourself
but don’t complain if i don’t like it
(Source: tamamuratamao, via womenorgnow)

10 ways men can help end domestic violence.
(via neighborly)
As a feminist Math, Science, and Robotics teacher, I have this exact problem. Not only do our society’s strict gender roles affect who signs up for my classes (1 girl in a each class of 15-19 boys), but the boys in the classroom dominate the conversation the entirety of my classes, even when I am constantly trying to check on the girls to make sure they feel included. It’s exhausting.
(via thenewwomensmovement)
(Source: colinfirthhasmoved, via thenewwomensmovement)
Until now, none of the major social networks have had women on their boards. Sheryl earned her spot after protests of Facebooks all-male board, and after her own request for the seat. Obvi this is way overdue.
Maybe these articles about the same idea (The Atlantic published the last notable one I am thinking of), are getting redundant? Why is “having it all” defined as career + family? Still, Slaughter makes good points. I say focus less on the idea of “having it all,” and more on the idea of being happy and fulfilled. Sacrifice the right things, and you may be able to be fulfilled without “having it all.”
What do you think? I can’t imagine I understand her pain or her anger.
The social construct of gender doesn’t seem to limit Gaga at all. She messes around with it in all sorts of interesting and provocative ways. One message of that is definitely that we shouldn’t be constrained or defined by traditional ideas of what it is to be male or female.

Members of the national security team receive an update on the mission against Osama bin Laden in the Situation Room of the White House on May 1.
From BuzzFeed’s list of the 45 Most Powerful photos of 2011 here: http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-most-powerful-photos-of-2011
Check out the gender in the room. You can see that they all feel what’s going on, but Hillary’s feelings are either deeper or more openly expressed.
I heard Bill Mahar have jokingly make this argument on his show. He was joking about the abuse scandals in the Catholic church and on the Penn State football team, and said that the common link was that there were no women involved in the organizations! “Any institution where there’s no women around—like the Church, like football, like the Middle East, like fraternities—things go to shit,” he said.
I don’t know enough about the specific instances at Penn State to totally endorse that idea, and I don’t think I could generalize that the presence of a woman would always stop child abuse. I do think that many organizations, businesses, religions, social groups, etc. could benefit from the presence of both men and women. Men and women bring different principles, ideas, and skills to the table and having both is better to me.
Perhaps a Catholic church with a total imbalance of gender and power made some male priests feel like they would be able to get away with serious, serial child abuse (and many did, for a long time anyway). And maybe the Penn State male-dominated football program covered up Jerry Sandusky’s sex crimes as part of a male belief and behavior that men shouldn’t involve themselves in the business of others.